Do all objects get larger in an “expanding universe”?

Do all objects get larger in an “expanding universe”?

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

I'm envisioning an analogy of the universe as a plane with marbles in that plane to represent different planets.

Now, if this plane expands how does this work? I assume that it is not like 'nothing' becomes 'something' then but rather expanding/stretching the universe; but doesn't this imply that everything around us is actually stretching/becoming bigger (like every atom/quarks) becomes a little bit bigger? Or is it just the space between those subatomic particles and combinations of these become bigger?

An example could be the structure of carbon dioxide becoming larger, but only because there is more space between the carbon and the oxygen atoms.

It would, if there were no interactions.

However, everyday matter is held together by other kinds of forces (electromagnetic, mainly). These are quite strong, and any "stretching" of space will be counteracted by these forces "pulling" the atom/molecule/object back to its original size.

So the expansion of the universe only matters on the larger, cosmic scale, between objects like galaxies which are separated by a large enough distance that they don't affect each other too much, gravitationally speaking.

Ummm this question made me think about a lecture from my teacher. When he was teaching us about the Big Bang theory!

From Wikipedia: The big bang states: The Big Bang theory is the prevailing cosmological model that describes the early development of the Universe.1 According to the theory, the Big Bang occurred approximately 13.798 ± 0.037 billion years ago, which is thus considered the age of the universe. At this time, the Universe was in an extremely hot and dense state and began expanding rapidly. After the initial expansion, the Universe cooled sufficiently to allow energy to be converted into various subatomic particles, including protons, neutrons, and electrons. As stated here.

Example of balloon:

So what you can imagine, there is a baloon with some dots on it. When you are blowing it, the balloon gets bigger, its size expands. But the dots stay where they were. There do comes a change in their size too. Galaxies expand too, but that doesn't mean that there is amount being added, but that means there is some space some extra space being added to it.

Objects expand:

Objects around you aren't expanding. Because this change would occur in years, so its almost ~0 this size as the changes occur inside the atom, atom contains magnetic field by the movement of electrons that would lesser down expansion and bla bla which is Chemistry so skip this. However, galaxies, stars, and on whole universe is expanding! And its been years it was expanding, and will expand! :)

Your plane example:

And your plane? Imagine that the plane is expanding. Hey wait! try this one (if possible, as this one would explain it fairly), place some magnets over a magnetic field, make sure north faces the north so they keep floating. Now when the surface expands, the magnets would stay there! They won't move backward or forwards just as the universe (plane) is moving. Similarly, as universe expands, planets don't expand! As they are not stitched to the universe or clamped to the universe. They are free moving.

No - Distances between objects get larger, but galaxies and clusters are dominated locally by gravity. The scale at which the expansion of the universe is significant is larger than the largest bound structures in the universe.

If you thought objects in the universe grew and stretched with the expansion, you would be forced to predict things which we do not actually observe, like the tearing apart of galaxies/clusters of galaxies at very high redshifts.

The expansion of the universe it self does not cause atoms to increase in size (because of the electromagnetic forces holding them together), but it does cause galaxies to move apart from each other (e.g., observed galaxy redshifts and Hubble's Law).

In reality, the expansion of the universe is known to be accelerating slightly (see Perlmutter et al., 1998). This acceleration puts a very small outward force on everything (including atoms). Although the electromagnetic forces in atoms hold everything together, it causes electrons to orbit protons at an (infinitesimally) larger distance from them.

If the acceleration of the universe's expansion increased many times over, this could have the potential to tear matter apart. The case of extremely large expansion acceleration is called the 'Big Rip'.

Do all objects get larger in an &ldquoexpanding universe&rdquo? - Astronomy

State the number of significant figures in the following:

A physical quantity P is related to four observables a, b, c and d as follows :

The percentage errors of measurement in a, b, c and d are 1%, 3%, 4% and 2%, respectively. What is the percentage error in the quantity P ? If the value of P calculated using the above relation turns out to be 3.763, to what value should you round off the result ?

Fill in the blanks by suitable conversion of units:

(a) 1 kg m 2 s &ndash2 = . g cm 2 s &ndash2

(d) G = 6.67 × 10 &ndash11 N m 2 (kg) &ndash2 =. (cm)3s &ndash2 g &ndash1 .

Rain is falling vertically with a speed of 30 m s &ndash1 . A woman rides a bicycle with a speed of 10 m s &ndash1 in the north to south direction. What is the direction in which she should hold her umbrella?

On an open ground, a motorist follows a track that turns to his left by an angle of 60° after every 500 m. Starting from a given turn, specify the displacement of the motorist at the third, sixth and eighth turn. Compare the magnitude of the displacement with the total path length covered by the motorist in each case.

A woman starts from her home at 9.00 am, walks with a speed of 5 km h -1 on a straight road up to her office 2.5 km away, stays at the office up to 5.00 pm, and returns home by an auto with a speed of 25 km h -1 . Choose suitable scales and plot the x-t graph of her motion.

A steam engine delivers 5.4 x 10 8 J of work per minute and services 3.6 x 10 9 J of heat per minute from its boiler. What is the efficiency of the engine? How much heat is wasted per minute?

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

How many questions do you think have been asked about Kevin Youkilis and Rick Porcello in the past day?

Way too many!. It was a brawl for god's sake. Coco Crisp against James Shields was a everlasting fire of a lot transcend because punches were in fact thrown set against to the indicated one though i do cerebrate Youkillis getting tackeld was pretty funny. But still.

BQ1: I think it was when the brawl between Boston and Tampa Bay happened last year. Where Aki, James, Carl, also Jonny Gomes were suspended for a wed of games.

BQ2: The exclusive ones i bottle think of are Aki also Jason Igrahursen in reverse existent be sweet on that.

Are birds mammals

Who would you take for the first draft pick in a MLB draft?

Can you mountain bike up and down mount kilimanjaro in Africa? More so can you unicycle it?

it's been done before, at least via the indicated guy

here are all the routes one can take relevant kilimanjaro, incorporate an just picture in pdf format…

there is and a scroll bellow "bicycle relevant kimimanjaro" by crane cousins…

unicycle, i would like to see it, but don't essay it alone, set unusual lucre or something, get some press together, represent history.

Danielle cramer

Hottest actor, model or singer out of.

American inventor

What did you get on the IAT test?

Who would you take on the rebound?

Though many of them are attractive, I like women among at least a C-cup and the bigger the better, that clip the discretional from 12 to 2, Pam and Jessica. Pam Anderson is clearly the "Sexier" of the two (several skimpy outfits/bikinis, playboy shoots, also 2 homemade pornos) represent Jessica "Cute" in comparison, but I happen to tap "Cute" girls over "Sexy" girls. Plus Jessica's youth and customary (non-implant) boobs parcel out her an added restriction over Pam, by my book. I partial hanker she would gain about 10 pulse or because to soften her face also the recurved of her body. The workouts and fitness training for Dukes connected with Hazard made her a bit thinner than average, putting her cozy with to the line between body average ponderosity also skinny, also I cerebrate "skinny" girls are unhealthy looking also less attractive.

Detailed plot synopsis for Cormac McCarthy?